The ‘English’ riots – exposing a can of worms
By Maid of Kent – Just two of the cases that have been brought to the attention of the British people following the so-called English riots of last week have exposed the previously hidden details behind the mass invasion of Britain by people from all over the world who are attracted purely by our welfare system.
Named the ‘English’ riots to avoid offending the other nations within Britain, although the Lib/Lab/Cons have no qualms about offending the English people who, apart from the feral few, did not participate at all – to have called these riots what they were, ethnic or immigrant riots, would have exposed to the world just how much mass immigration has destroyed the fabric of British life.
Loudly trumpeted by the mainstream media is the case of a council tenant who has been threatened with eviction by Wandsworth Council because her 18-year-old son has been accused of looting during the riots.
A white press photographer gets a dose of enriched Britain during the Birmingham riots
With the sole intention of promoting the Lib/Lab/Con appearance of being tough on the lawbreakers who ran rampant during the riots, the mainstream media is headlining the case to convince the British public that the politicians in Westminster mean what they say this time.
Apart from the fact that all kinds of Lib/Lab/Con legislation will prevent most, if not all, evictions, the serving of an Eviction Notice is only a notification that the council will seek to have a tenant evicted. It does not mean that the tenant will be evicted.
What is a particular eye opener for the British people in this specific case is hidden in the details. The tenant herself insists that she is not responsible for the actions of her 18-year-old son, even though he still lives with her. Many English parents would beg to differ with this, believing that however old their offspring are, as parents they will always feel responsible for the actions of the children that they have produced and raised – and even if they are unable to change the behaviour of their adult offspring, will still feel a sense of shame at any bad behaviour exhibited by them.
However, that aside, the particular point of interest in this case is the news that this council tenant, Maite de la Calva, is Spanish-born and has been living in Britain since 1986. It emerges that she was involved in the Poll Tax Riots of 1990 which may again bring the question to mind of why foreigners come to our country and within a few short years are so unhappy about our domestic politics that they then feel the need to riot on our streets instead of packing up and going back to where they come from.
This, however, didn’t happen. This Spanish resident of London, a former professional dancer, has settled here and occupied precious social housing which British people find hard to get. She and her two children – no mention of a Mr de la Calva – not only occupy social housing but also live on benefits. Mentioning that she does part-time work and also mentioning that she does voluntary work, the mainstream media conveniently doesn’t specify if this part-time work and voluntary work are one and the same, so the British taxpayer may well be paying for her whole existence in our country.
Not only that, but it emerges that Ms de la Calva owes £1806.09 in rent arrears for her social housing – an evictable offence in itself, which raises the obvious question of why this council tenant has not been evicted by Wandsworth Council already.
So in short we have a foreigner, albeit an EU citizen, who riots on our streets, does not work to support herself and her children, lives in social housing and, even with the support of benefits paid for by the British people, still does not pay the small amount of rent due on that social housing.
Apart from the obvious conclusion that successive British Lib/Lab/Con governments have allowed foreigners to live a life of ease paid for by the British people, this case reveals the many lies that they have told us about citizens of other EU countries being restricted in their access to our welfare system and also about how these foreigners bring much-needed skills to our country or do the jobs that we cannot or will not do.
While British citizens could never move to Spain or any other EU country and be supported and housed by the state concerned, it appears that the British people are expected to pay for any and all EU citizens that arrive here – often providing benefits that are not available to the British people.
That the governments of every other EU member nation can legally restrict access to any state-funded welfare schemes, including social housing, to their own citizens, points to the criminal incompetence and dishonesty of the Lib/Lab/Con parties in government, who have consistently lied that citizens from other EU member states either do not have access to our welfare state or that their ability to restrict access is limited by EU law.
If other EU member nations can and do restrict access to state-funded welfare schemes so that only their citizens benefit, why is the British taxpayer paying for social housing and benefits for citizens of other EU nations?
The second case brought to our attention by the ‘English’ riots is that of Amed Pelle. British people may be forgiven for not recognising the ‘English’ first name Amed or the ‘English’ surname Pelle, but the Lib/Lab/Cons are eager to persuade us that these riots were ‘English’ so one would assume that they think of Amed Pelle as English.
Surprisingly, however, it turns out that this ‘English’ man charged with inciting rioters to harm the police is in fact Cuban. This 18-year-old Cuban-born unemployed man is another foreigner living in our country with all expenses paid for by the British taxpayer.
The British people may wonder why we have to pay to support a Cuban immigrant who, living on benefits, is obviously not here to do the work the British cannot or will not do.
It may also seem strange to the British people that someone would move here from Cuba, a small island off the coast of the American continent.
Constantly told by the Lib/Lab/Cons and the Liberal Marxist media that immigrants either flee persecution in the homelands or come here to get the chance to improve their lives, surely Cubans doing either could move to countries which are much nearer to Cuba? The USA is not only much closer to Cuba than Britain but is a considerably larger country that has many Cuban communities, so why would this Cuban family choose to travel so far to our country for their new lives?
Considering the fact that these immigrants appear to choose a life on British taxpayer-funded benefits as opposed to improving their lives through the opportunities provided them by our country, we can only assume that they come here solely to live lives of ease provided by our hard work.
Will this unemployed benefits-supported immigrant from Cuba be deported if found guilty of incitement to break our law?
Don’t hold your breath. Under the Human Rights Act passed by Labour and obviously supported by the Lib/Cons, who have not repealed or reformed this legislation, not one foreign rioter will be expelled from our country.
These two cases alone highlight the failings of the Lib/Lab/Cons in government and their betrayal of the British people. Paying out uncounted £billions of British taxpayers’ money to support foreigners living in Britain, the Lib/Lab/Con politicians now tell us that the pot is empty and there is nothing left to pay for the pensions of the British people who have worked hard all of their lives, and that we must all pay more in taxes to support ‘our’ benefits and welfare programmes.
These two cases of taxpayer-supported foreigners living in Britain are just the tip of the iceberg, an iceberg which has torn a huge hole into our country’s finances, leaving us bankrupt.
When the Lib/Lab/Cons have had six decades to stop this abuse of the British people and have not only failed completely to protect us but have accelerated the financial destruction by their policies of mass uncontrolled immigration, the British people cannot realistically expect them to change now, whatever they promise the electorate.
The only way to ensure that the British government represents and protects the interests of the British people is to make sure that the British government does not include any of the traitorous Lib/Lab/Con politicians who have turned their backs on us.
A British National Party government will represent and protect the British people, their interests and their finances, so let us make sure that the next British government is a British National Party government; then these foreign parasites who dislike us and our country so much can be returned to their homelands and the British taxpayer can be richer for not having to pay for them and their benefits.
If you liked this news article, please donate online or by ringing 0844 8094581 to help with running costs and improvements of this website. If operators are busy, please try again.